|
The IMF's Executive Board agreed to improve IMF transparency in September, including writing documents in clearer language and making them available in other languages than English. It has been agreed that:
These moves are welcome although the Bretton Woods Project is concerned that publication of internal evaluations has not been made mandatory, nor are staff mission reports assessing progress with programme implementation to be made available. The Project is also concerned that the staff do not produce "programme completion reports", which assess whether programmes have achieved their objectives and whether conditions were implemented (or why programmes have broken down). The staff argue that assessment is automatically carried out when a new programme is formulated. However, this may not be the case if there is delay in agreeing a new programme, and consistency and quality of analysis is not assured. This text may be freely used providing the source is credited. This page is: <http://brettonwoodsproject.org/art.shtml?x=15435> Published: 26 October 2000 , last edited: 6 August 2003 Viewings since posted: 1822 |
Articles: 2381 Special coverage of Bretton Woods II, updated daily with the latest news and analysis: www.brettonwoodsproject.org/BW2/ Newswire |
home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact
RSS.91: highlights | newswire |
validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508
powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits