Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



Protests at UN collaboration with Bank and Fund

News|Bretton Woods Project|11 August 2000|update 18|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

In June, 80 non-governmental organizations and people's movements issued a joint statement condemning the UN's involvement in a joint UN, WB, IMF and OECD report A Better World for All, released during the follow-up summit to the Copenhagen Social Summit held five years ago.

They called on Member States to reject "A Better World for All which does not reflect the spirit, opinion and positions of the UN as a whole, particularly that of civil society. NGOs further pledge to intensify a global campaign against the document".

The NGOs, peoples' organisations and movements expressed "outrage" that:

  • the document was presented as a new consensus between the United Nations, the OECD, the IMF and the World Bank, thereby reinforcing Northern perspectives and disempowering the South while undermining the concept of political inclusiveness that defines the UN;
  • the timing of the release of the "biased messages", by the Secretary-General at opening sessions of the General Assembly and Geneva 2000 forum, pre-empted negotiations and devalued its very process;
  • equal status was accorded to the signatories despite a clear distinction between the UN and its specialised agencies;
  • the document promotes an image of poor people living only in the South who will be grateful for assistance, as opposed to empowering people living in poverty everywhere to demand their rights;
  • the report's characterisation of "pro-poor growth" makes Southern people themselves responsible for climbing out of poverty;
  • the document not only fails to recognise the role of IFI liberalisation policies in generating poverty, but instead proposes to eradicate poverty with more of the same medicine - despite the recent failure of these very same policies in East Asia.

Among other things the statement called for:

  • a re-commitment to the social summit process by analysing the root causes of poverty and gender inequality in the context of current globalization policies;
  • the introduction of a Currency Transfer Tax (CTT) to counter the instability of global capital transactions and mobilise further resources for social development.

The NGO joint statement

A Better World For All

Published: 11 August 2000 , last edited: 27 May 2010

Viewings since posted: 3642

Articles: 3795

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Recent briefings & reports

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013  25 April 2013

Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience  24 April 2013

The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury  13 March 2013

World Bank on jobs: a "significant departure" or "business as usual"? 13 February 2013

The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012   26 October 2012

Latest video from IFIwatch.tv

In my place: Stop land grabs 17 April

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits