Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



Chad-Cameroon discussions reach peak

News|Bretton Woods Project|15 June 1999|update 13|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

The Bank is due to decide in the next few weeks whether to support the Chad-Cameroon oil pipeline. Chad's Country Assistance Strategy will come to the Bank's Board in July, and loans for the project itself in September. NGOs remain concerned about a number of issues, for example the amount of money that Chad and Cameroon can expect to gain, what this will be used for, the security/human rights situation in the two countries and how well the project's villager compensation and environmental strategy will be implemented.

The Bank's Country Strategy states that: "the likely development prospects in the absence of oil are bleak." It estimates that oil revenues will average between $45m and 270m per year during the first seven years of full oil production (depending on oil prices) and says that a new Revenue Management Law for Chad will ensure it is invested in human resources and infrastructure.

Bank project staff also claim that there is

"a general consensus now in Chad that the project provides a potentially powerful tool to fight poverty".

The Bank is overlooking an April declaration by Chadian civil society groups and a document sent out by Chadian NGO network CILONG in May. These requested a two year moratorium on project approval so that more studies and consultations can take place on remaining controversial issues.

As Jaroslava Colajacomo of the Riforma della Banca Mondiale, Italy, points out

"They are now almost ready to drill the oil. No major problems are envisaged. The consortium's behaviour on compensation and the important violations of Bank's environmental and social guidelines are just ignored".

A critique by German NGO Urgewald of the Bank's leaked Country Strategy stresses the poor experience of other countries which relied too heavily on oil for development and that the Bank's optimistic assertion of "a serious effort of transition towards democracy" is not shared by the US State Department.

Further information, including the April Bebedja Declaration, available from Korinna Horta, korinna@edf.org

Published: 15 June 1999 , last edited: 29 June 2009

Viewings since posted: 4190

Articles: 3795

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Recent briefings & reports

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013  25 April 2013

Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience  24 April 2013

The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury  13 March 2013

World Bank on jobs: a "significant departure" or "business as usual"? 13 February 2013

The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012   26 October 2012

Latest video from IFIwatch.tv

The awakening of the squares 20 May

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits