Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



IMF succession process “secretive and undemocratic”

News|Bretton Woods Project|15 April 2000|update 16|url
print|email|bookmarkdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditFacebookGoogle Bookmarks

More than 120 NGOs and academics in 38 countries demanded an end to the secretive and undemocratic process for appointing the IMF Managing Director. In a letter to governors on the International Monetary and Finance Committee they called for a transparent process and for the new head to be sympathetic to and understanding of the needs of developing countries. Elements of a transparent process should include:

  • disclosure of the criteria being sought in candidates;
  • encouraging all countries to propose candidates;
  • making public the list of candidates;
  • requiring candidates to make public their views and priorities on the structure and role of the IMF; and
  • instituting a recorded, public Board vote on the candidates.

They also called for greater Board transparency, including recorded and published vote taking and transparent agenda setting and reporting processes.

For full letter email awood@brettonwoodsproject.org.

Published: 15 April 2000 , last edited: 12 August 2003

Viewings since posted: 1919

Articles: 2337

Special coverage of Bretton Woods II, updated daily with the latest news and analysis: www.brettonwoodsproject.org/BW2/

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits