Instituting IMF evaluation
News||15 June 1999|update 13|
Two more external evaluations of the IMF's activities are about to be completed. They cover the IMF's surveillance function and research activities. Following these there will be a review of the IMF's ad hoc evaluation approach to decide whether to adopt a permanent evaluation mechanism. This will be discussed at the Autumn meetings.
Some Executive Directors (including Japan, Canada and the UK) favour an independent, permanent evaluation unit. support an external evaluation mechanism but with little clarity on how it should function. Other directors favour formalising the current ad hoc mechanism.
NGOs are concerned that the trial ad hoc procedure is unsystematic and has proved ineffective. Three reports were supposed be carried out each year, but after 2 years only I has been completed.
This text may be freely used providing the source is credited.
Published: 15 June 1999 , last edited: 29 June 2009
Viewings since posted: 3891
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013 25 April 2013
Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience 24 April 2013
The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury 13 March 2013
The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012 26 October 2012