Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



Kyrgz mine spill lessons

News|Bretton Woods Project|15 December 1998|update 11|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

A serious cyanide spill at an IFC- and MIGA-backed mine this May raises questions about the Bank Group environmental procedures for mines. NGOs stress the need for:

  1. independent environmental audits of major mine operations; open access to all information about environmental or human health safety and risks;
  2. open communications before, during, and after an environmental accident;
  3. community monitoring boards at major mine operations.

They have also pushed for changes in the Bank Group's policies and guidelines relating to mining, especially in emergency response planning, environmental impacts and practices, public access to information, "bad actor" provisions, and environmental performance bonds.

The Barskaun mine in Kyrgztan is operated by a subsidiary of Cameco, a Canadian corporation. The company has produced a report about the chemical spill, which occurred as lorries were driving to the plant, which is next to a huge freshwater lake which supplies water to neighbouring countries. One report by Russian officials suggests that a local resident died from the pollution, although this is contested by the company. It is agreed, however, that many others suffered severe health effects.

The company did not quickly notify residents downstream, and only paid flat rate compensation to people in the area ($50 to adults, $25 to children), yet it denied mismanagement of the delivery process or spill response. The company has still not made its environmental impact assessment publicly available, nor its spill response plan. There are continuing concerns about mine tailings disposal.

In a recent detailed letter NGOs called for an independent environmental audit of the mine and its operating plans.

In October Natalia Ablova, Bureau on Human Rights, and Kalia Moldogazieva of the Human Development Center "Tree of Life" travelled to Washington to make these points directly to IFC and MIGA staff and Bank Executive Directors. They argued that the specific impacts of the project serious, and that the incident has poisoned public opinion against foreign companies and aid agencies at a critical time in their young democracy.

Contact: Doug Norlen, Pacific Environmental Resources Center, c/o CIEL, 1367 Connecticut Ave., NW, Washington, DC 10036, em: dnorlen@igc.org.

Published: 15 December 1998 , last edited: 17 November 2008

Viewings since posted: 5270

Articles: 3795

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Recent briefings & reports

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013  25 April 2013

Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience  24 April 2013

The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury  13 March 2013

World Bank on jobs: a "significant departure" or "business as usual"? 13 February 2013

The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012   26 October 2012

Latest video from IFIwatch.tv

In my place: Stop land grabs 17 April

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits