New Bank paradigm: Stiglitz and Fine approaches clash
News||15 December 1998|update 11|
In October World Bank Chief Economist Joe Stiglitz made another major speech going "beyond the well-documented failures of the Washington consensus to begin providing the foundations of an alternative paradigm". He rejected technical modelling approaches and defined development broadly as a transformation of society to "modern" ways of thinking and acting before setting out elements of development strategy for the private sector, public sector, communities, families and individuals.
A few days before Ben Fine, Professor of Economics at the School of Oriental and African Studies, London, had given a paper expressing concerns about NGOs and researchers getting drawn into the Bank's new framework without understanding its intellectual origins and limitations. The new terms being used, such as "social capital", which appear to move beyond the n individualistic approach of neo-classical economics, reflect an extension of economic tools into the social and political arenas. Issues of class, power, and market structures still cannot be squarely addressed by the Bank's new analytical concepts.
For the Neither the Washington Nor the Post-Washington Consensus paper contact Jaya Balakrishnan at SOAS: firstname.lastname@example.org
The Stiglitz lecture is available from the Bank or the Bretton Woods Project.
This text may be freely used providing the source is credited.
Published: 15 December 1998 , last edited: 17 November 2008
Viewings since posted: 4218
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013 25 April 2013
Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience 24 April 2013
The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury 13 March 2013
The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012 26 October 2012