Social policy limitations
News||15 December 1998|update 11|
Bob Deacon, Director of the Globalization and Social Policy Programme (based in Sheffield and Helsinki) criticised the World Bank's stand on social policy at a recent Overseas Development Institute discussion meeting in London. He said that whilst the Bank had improved its position on public expenditure on health and education, and was arguing these points with borrower governments, its emphasis on beneficiary targeting/safety nets and individual responsibility for risks detracts from the greater goals of equal, universal provision. The targeting approach, which argues that the middle classes should not be allowed to absorb subsidies or welfare payments, misses the political economy questions of how you fund and garner support for state transfers. Individualisation rather than pooling of risks, eg in pension fund payments, reflects an Anglo-Saxon model which is not supported in much of Europe. Given the World Bank's importance in the global discourse on social policy, he urged those who care about equality to take up these questions with the Bank, and to seek alliances with more progressive UN agencies.
Transcripts of this and previous meetings in the global governance series can be found on the ODI web-site: www.oneworld.org/odi/
This text may be freely used providing the source is credited.
Published: 15 December 1998 , last edited: 17 November 2008
Viewings since posted: 4894
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013 25 April 2013
Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience 24 April 2013
The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury 13 March 2013
The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012 26 October 2012