Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



Voices of the Poor study oversold by Bank

News|Bretton Woods Project|15 April 2000|update 16|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

In mid-March the World Bank launched the first of a new set of studies, Voices of the Poor. This effort to understand poverty from poor peoples's perspectives is a summary of testimony from over 60,000 men and women in 60 countries. It emphasises that poorer peoples' lives are shaped by hunger, powerlessness, social isolation, gender inequality and lack of voice in key decisions that affect their lives.

Steps to discover directly how poorer peoples' view their experiences are very welcome. However, the way the Bank's external affairs team launched the report has caused confusion. Incredibly, the Bank's press release claimed "World Bank says findings already mainstreamed into its development work".

The Voices of the Poor series is based on two separate sets of interviews and research methods. The report Can Anyone Hear Us?, launched in March, is based on material generated in Participatory Poverty Assessments (PPAs) for the Bank throughout the 1990s. The second volume will be based on a new body of participatory research undertaken specifically for the Poverty WDR during 1999, involving the World Bank, Institute for Development Studies (IDS) and many other research institutes.

Anne Rademacher, a team member on the Can Anyone Hear Us? exercise cautioned, in a posting to the electronic conference on the Poverty World Development Report, that "the book tells us more about struggles within the Bank as an institution than it does about what those at the margins have to say about poverty." She said the study has to be read carefully because PPA data were collected using mixed and inconsistent methods and "... the very purpose of PPAs is to "counter" the urge to generalize about poverty and its experience, outlining contours like race, gender, class, ethnicity, and history for a particular place and social group. The act of aggregating PPAs to a global level, then, fundamentally negates their local, place-specific value for understanding poverty."

Further information: www.worldbank.org/ poverty/wdrpoverty/conspoor/

Published: 15 April 2000 , last edited: 8 February 2010

Viewings since posted: 4384

Articles: 3795

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Recent briefings & reports

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013  25 April 2013

Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience  24 April 2013

The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury  13 March 2013

World Bank on jobs: a "significant departure" or "business as usual"? 13 February 2013

The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012   26 October 2012

Latest video from IFIwatch.tv

In my place: Stop land grabs 17 April

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits