Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



PRSP case studies report

News|Bretton Woods Project|5 April 2001|update 22|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

A new report summarises some of the continued challenges for participatory poverty reduction processes.

Written for the UK's Department for International Development, the study finds that problems include a lack of common understanding of the meaning of participation. It also pointed to:

  • widespread antipathy towards the HIPC initiative, and the perception that the PRSP process is dominated by the World Bank and IMF;
  • concern over flexibility on how far macroeconomic frameworks can integrate poverty reduction concerns, especially different perspectives on the distributional effects of growth and the long-term effects of structural policies.

The paper looks in detail at Ghana, Vietnam and Zambia. It finds that the PRSP process, because of its direct link to new development assistance and debt relief, has increased the standing of civil society in setting national economic goals. Governments are, however, concerned about political risks and constrained by a lack of experience in how to manage civil society engagement. The lack of assessment criteria for participation makes it easy for some to do little more than organise meetings to consider pre-prepared plans. The paper also finds that:

  • time pressures create an unfavourable backdrop in which to build new civil society - government relationships;
  • poorer communities should participate directly, not just indirectly through NGOs;
  • civil society capacity is limited and many organisations do not have sufficient analytical, advocacy and research capacities.

The report concludes that the constructive involvement of civil society is likely to prove difficult and complex to manage. There remains a great deal of uncertainty around the PRSP, at every level of government, within civil society and between the two. Participation will only be secured if civil society institutions are convinced donors and governments are willing to countenance real participation and produce tangible results. Donors have a key role in encouraging a good climate for government and civil society to work together.

To achieve this, the primary objectives of the PRSP should be reviewed, with emphasis placed on supporting the goals and principles of the Comprehensive Development Framework and the International Development Targets, rather than the shorter-term objectives of the enhanced HIPC initiative.

Civil Society Participation in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs)

c-simpson@dfid.gov.uk

www.dfid.gov.uk

Published: 5 April 2001 , last edited: 27 May 2010

Viewings since posted: 4153

Articles: 3365

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Επίκεντρο η Ελλάδα (Articles in Greek)
http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/el/
Με αφορμή την χωρίς προηγούμενο δραστηριότητα του ΔΝΤ στην Ελλάδα, το Bretton Woods Project παρέχει ορισμένα απο τα άρθρα του στα Ελληνικά.

Recent briefings & reports

Gender WDR: Limits, gaps, and fudges  8 February 2012

Time for a new consensus: Regulating financial flows for stability and development  15 December 2011

Breaking the mould: How Latin America is coping with volatile capital flows  15 December 2011

No fairy tale: Singrauli, India, still suffering years after World Bank coal investments  18 November 2011

Climate Investment Funds Monitor: October 2011   27 October 2011

Power surge: Lessons for the World Bank from Indian women's participation in energy projects  21 September 2011

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits