Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



WB study questions breadth and impact of PRSP participation

News|Bretton Woods Project|25 March 2002|update 27|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

A World Bank study of participation in PRSPs has set out a number of criticisms. The study, by the Participation Team of the Bank's Social Development Department, brings together external assessments with an in-house review of PRSPs in-progress and completed.

The report opens with a synthesis of the views of a number of Northern NGOs, national and UN development agencies. Of the type of participation generated, the authors state that "almost all countries are on the lower half of the spectrum"; information-sharing and consultation is largely confined to capital cities. The process is driven by finance and planning ministries, with other ministries such as health and education playing minor roles. Under CSO participation, the authors believe that NGOs are assuming an increasingly important role, however non-conventional NGOs, such as community groups and women's organisations, are given little attention. Other weaknesses lie in poor quality data and a lack of gender analysis. The authors of the review admit, however, that their own analysis of participation in PRSPs is "static, document-centric and generally not informed by accounts from the site."

The range and composition of CSO representation in completed PRSPs has been deficient. It was not clear to the authors to what extent the views gathered had influenced the content of the final Papers. They concluded that: "macroeconomic issues and the broad development model remain unchallenged." This assessment coincides with the views offered by the UK's Department For International Development in a paper on the PRSP process. DFID asserts that "the quality of the outputs produced through consultation processes, and their consequent impact on policy-making, is a real concern." As a result, the "Bank has not always made a positive contribution to maximising the impact of consultation and participation on PRS policy."

Pointing to ways forward, the Bank study highlights the need for participation after the PRSP has been completed. It suggests joint learning and assessment across countries, greater focus on the participation of local government; and the creation of a new fund to deepen and improve the quality of participation.

World Bank study

Published: 25 March 2002 , last edited: 27 May 2010

Viewings since posted: 4417

Articles: 3466

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Επίκεντρο η Ελλάδα (Articles in Greek)
http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/el/
Με αφορμή την χωρίς προηγούμενο δραστηριότητα του ΔΝΤ στην Ελλάδα, το Bretton Woods Project παρέχει ορισμένα απο τα άρθρα του στα Ελληνικά.

Recent briefings & reports

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 5: April 2012   1 May 2012

'Leveraging' private sector finance: How does it work and what are the risks?  18 April 2012

IMF policy recommendations: Not enough change after the crisis  27 March 2012

Memorandum by the Bretton Woods Project for the UK Treasury Committee: Treasury Committee inquiry into global imbalances  27 February 2012

Gender WDR: Limits, gaps, and fudges  8 February 2012

Breaking the mould: How Latin America is coping with volatile capital flows  15 December 2011

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits