|
After a meeting of G7 Finance Ministers in Halifax in mid-June, the grants versus loans controversy has finally been resolved. The disagreement has held up replenishment of the World Bank's International Development Association (IDA) program, which provides concessional loans to some 79 countries. The deal means that 18-21 per cent of IDA aid will now come in the form of grants rather than loans. Countries whose average per capita income is below one dollar a day will receive almost all their aid in the form of grants. The US had been arguing that 50 per cent of funds should be given as grants, despite the fears of European ministers that without increasing the total amount of money available, the switch to grants would soon exhaust available funds. There have been suggestions that this was the ultimate goal of the Bush administration, taking into account its distrust of international bodies, and its fondness for laissez-faire economic policies. $23 billion will be made available over the next three years, of which $13 billion will come from new contributions from 39 donor countries - an 18 per cent increase over levels in the previous replenishment. G8 leaders were ambiguous about whether a majority of the new funds would be directed to African nations, leaving the decision up to individual donor priorities and conditional on good governance and the "promotion of economic freedom" by African governments. Donors want to see the World Bank establish a results-based measurement system to "link IDA programs to a country's development outcomes". Civil society organizations have reacted cautiously to the grants move. Some groups have asserted that the shift to grants will not make a significant difference to borrowing countries for another decade. Other commentators have argued that the switch to grants will mean a significant boost to countries, especially those who have seen debt commitments in hard currencies skyrocket after local currency devaluation. IDA Donors Reach Agreement on Increased Funding for Poorest Countries, World Bank Taken for granted? US Proposals to Reform the World Bank's IDA Examined, Bretton Woods Project This text may be freely used providing the source is credited. This page is: <http://brettonwoodsproject.org/art.shtml?x=16164> Published: 24 July 2002 , last edited: 27 May 2010 Viewings since posted: 3677 |
Articles: 3342 Επίκεντρο η Ελλάδα (Articles in Greek) Recent briefings & reports
Time for a new consensus: Regulating financial flows for stability and development 15 December 2011
Breaking the Mould: How Latin America is coping with volatile capital flows 15 December 2011
No fairy tale: Singrauli, India, still suffering years after World Bank coal investments 18 November 2011
Climate Investment Funds Monitor: October 2011 27 October 2011
Power surge: Lessons for the World Bank from Indian women's participation in energy projects 21 September 2011
Navigating complex dilemmas: the Bank on violence, conflict and peace building 16 September 2011 Newswire |
home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact
RSS.91: highlights | newswire |
validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508
powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits