|
Following the article in Bretton Woods Update 26 on the announcement by the IMF Evaluation Office of its work programme, its Director sent a letter clarifying his position. The article complained that the draft evaluation programme submitted to the public for comment was redundant as another version was circulated to Board members at the same time. The EVO argues that "circulation of every interim product is neither feasible nor necessary. We did not take a final decision until all comments within the extended deadline had been received". This text may be freely used providing the source is credited. This page is: <http://brettonwoodsproject.org/art.shtml?x=16212> Published: 25 March 2002 , last edited: 26 June 2006 Viewings since posted: 1969 |
Articles: 2267 Newswire |
home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact
RSS.91: highlights | newswire |
validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508
powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits