Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



Latest developments: World Bank Extractive Industries Review

News|Bretton Woods Project|4 February 2002|update 27|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

NGOs' concerns have been taken into consideration by the Eminent Person, Dr. Salim, and they have managed to achieve substantial changes in the Extractive Industries Review (EIR) process. In a recent letter to all stakeholders of the review (30th January), Dr. Salim announced the following changes to the EIR process:

New timeframe

Time constraints have been major features of the EIR process, especially because a draft of the report was expected to be ready by the World Summit in Johannesburg. The timeframe has now been extended until June 2003. Hence, the World Bank's evaluation units (Operations Evaluation Department and Operations Evaluation Group) reports on the performance of past and present projects in oil, gas and mining will be also available to the participants for their review. The first Regional Workshop will take place in Mexico in April.

Independence of the Secretariat

Many anxieties were expressed about the location of the secretariat being inside the IFC. Dr. Salim announced that from February 1st, the secretariat will be based in Jakarta, as many NGOs had suggested.

Inclusiveness of the Process

At the planning workshop in Brussels, one of NGOs' first concerns was about a skewed representation and the little representation of Africa. Moreover, others were questioning World Bank involvement in this process. Dr Salim has reassured the participants that his team will do their "best to involve every stakeholder, and that everyone, the governments, the civil society, the business, and the World Bank Group can share their opinions in some way."

Budget Concerns

Dr. Salim pointed out that, although he has control over the budget, the original budget of US$ 3.1 million "probably will not suffice.". However, he retains the independence to raise funds if necessary.

New Terms of Reference (TOR)

The TOR came under fire, because it stated that the Bank "believes that such industries [extractive industries] make a positive contribution to sustainable development and poverty reduction". NGOs felt that the Bank had predetermined the conclusions even before the EIR had started. That has now been changed to "questions have been raised about how and whether such industries can make a positive contribution to sustainable development and poverty reduction."

Published: 4 February 2002 , last edited: 27 May 2010

Viewings since posted: 4162

Articles: 3365

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Επίκεντρο η Ελλάδα (Articles in Greek)
http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/el/
Με αφορμή την χωρίς προηγούμενο δραστηριότητα του ΔΝΤ στην Ελλάδα, το Bretton Woods Project παρέχει ορισμένα απο τα άρθρα του στα Ελληνικά.

Recent briefings & reports

Gender WDR: Limits, gaps, and fudges  8 February 2012

Time for a new consensus: Regulating financial flows for stability and development  15 December 2011

Breaking the Mould: How Latin America is coping with volatile capital flows  15 December 2011

No fairy tale: Singrauli, India, still suffering years after World Bank coal investments  18 November 2011

Climate Investment Funds Monitor: October 2011   27 October 2011

Power surge: Lessons for the World Bank from Indian women's participation in energy projects  21 September 2011

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits