Bolivian PRGF a “blind alley”
News||15 September 2003|update 36|
A new report by Bolivian NGO CEDLA shows that despite a new emphasis on civil society participation and poverty alleviation, the core policies attached to IMF loans have not changed. Participation in the design of the national poverty reduction strategy excluded many non-governmental actors and did not have the supposed impact on the final document. Using evidence from past programmes, the authors conclude the Fund's Poverty Reduction and Growth facility and the PRSP are "unlikely to change the prospects of the economy and of the majority of the people in Bolivia". They recommend social impact analysis of proposed policies and open public debate before a new letter of intent is signed.
This text may be freely used providing the source is credited.
Published: 15 September 2003 , last edited: 12 February 2009
Viewings since posted: 6856
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013 25 April 2013
Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience 24 April 2013
The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury 13 March 2013
The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012 26 October 2012