IMF confronting critics over ‘misunderstandings’
News||17 September 2003|update 36|
The IMF often seems to consider its lack of popularity is due to misunderstandings or misrepresentation of its role. A recent Fund publication (Common criticisms: some responses), in question and answer format, attempts to present its actions in a more favourable light. Questions include: "do IMF-supported programs favor bankers and elites?" and "is the IMF dominated by the G-7 (especially the U.S. Treasury)?"
Some long-standing IMF critics (50 Years is Enough, Bretton Woods Project, Center of Concern and Halifax Initiative) have written a rebuttal of this document in time for the Annual Meetings.
This text may be freely used providing the source is credited.
Published: 17 September 2003 , last edited: 12 February 2009
Viewings since posted: 7061
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013 25 April 2013
Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience 24 April 2013
The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury 13 March 2013
The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012 26 October 2012