Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



IMF struggles to reach agreement on transparency

News|Bretton Woods Project|17 November 2003|update 37|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

A review of the IMF transparency policy was finally concluded in September. Amendments to the current policy still need to be approved before the various decisions take effect. The timing for this is unclear.

Discussions started in June but stalled on some key aspects (see Update 35). The IMF Executive Board has now reached a compromise on these, including a move towards more systematic publication of some country documents. Board meetings on this were split, largely along a North/South axis. Some countries including the US want systematic publication of documents to allow investors to make better-informed decisions. Others resist this, arguing that "this could undermine the candor of discussions and documents and the advisory role of the Fund".

The key issue considered by the Board in June and September was publication of country reports. The main ones are Article IV and Use of Fund Resources, in particular in cases of 'exceptional access' to Fund resources. Fund staff outlined options and the Board finally reached a compromise on 'voluntary but presumed' publication. Rather than publication being the default option, this retains a requirement for countries to give explicit consent before publication. Countries will have to give a reason if they refuse to do so. This will take effect only in July 2004.

Another issue on the table was whether the Fund should have a systematic policy on when to allow deletions of highly politically sensitive material in staff reports. Until now the policy covers mostly deletions of market-sensitive information. Deletion of politically sensitive information however is also possible, mostly through the very debatable practice of 'side letters' (see At Issue 'G-7, civil society press for IMF, World Bank transparency reforms').

The Board also agreed to publish its agenda in advance, following the the World Bank's example. No progress was made however in the debate over publication of the minutes of the Board. These are currently accessible only after 10 years. Similarly there was no discussion on publishing in advance draft country intention documents, such as letters of intent.

Published: 17 November 2003 , last edited: 12 February 2009

Viewings since posted: 3604

Articles: 3365

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Επίκεντρο η Ελλάδα (Articles in Greek)
http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/el/
Με αφορμή την χωρίς προηγούμενο δραστηριότητα του ΔΝΤ στην Ελλάδα, το Bretton Woods Project παρέχει ορισμένα απο τα άρθρα του στα Ελληνικά.

Recent briefings & reports

Gender WDR: Limits, gaps, and fudges  8 February 2012

Time for a new consensus: Regulating financial flows for stability and development  15 December 2011

Breaking the mould: How Latin America is coping with volatile capital flows  15 December 2011

No fairy tale: Singrauli, India, still suffering years after World Bank coal investments  18 November 2011

Climate Investment Funds Monitor: October 2011   27 October 2011

Power surge: Lessons for the World Bank from Indian women's participation in energy projects  21 September 2011

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits