Controversy surrounds Bank role in India water privatisationAccusations emerged in late July that the World Bank had pressured the Indian government to select Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC) for advisory work undertaken as part of the Delhi Water Sector Project. Indian anti-corruption group Parivartan used national freedom of information laws to gain access to the correspondence between the Delhi Jal Board, which oversees water supply in the Indian capital, and World Bank officials. World Bank country director for India Michael Carter said "the insinuation that the Bank attempted to favour PwC is completely unfounded." This text may be freely used providing the source is credited. This page is: <http://brettonwoodsproject.org/art.shtml?x=351635> Published: 12 September 2005 , last edited: 27 May 2010 Viewings since posted: 8035 |
Articles: 3365 Επίκεντρο η Ελλάδα (Articles in Greek) Recent briefings & reports
Gender WDR: Limits, gaps, and fudges 8 February 2012
Time for a new consensus: Regulating financial flows for stability and development 15 December 2011
Breaking the mould: How Latin America is coping with volatile capital flows 15 December 2011
No fairy tale: Singrauli, India, still suffering years after World Bank coal investments 18 November 2011
Climate Investment Funds Monitor: October 2011 27 October 2011
Power surge: Lessons for the World Bank from Indian women's participation in energy projects 21 September 2011 Newswire |
home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact
RSS.91: highlights | newswire |
validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508
powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits