World Bank's aid allocation may undermine growth
News||27 November 2008|update 63|
An article by researcher Elisa Van Waeyenberge's published by the Centre for Development Policy & Research in London criticises the way the World Bank allocates IDA funds. The Bank's aid is selectively allocated based on the use of the Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) score (see Update 52, 43). "The CPIA is derived from judgments of Bank staff on country performance on a set of macroeconomic, structural, social and governance criteria ... which embody a set of well-known neo-liberal economic norms". Better performing countries receive on average five times as much as the worst performers.
She argues that "selective allocation of aid based on the CPIA risks locking in an extensive policy agenda with ambiguous, if not adverse, repercussions for growth." Van Waeyenberge also notes that the CPIA ignores need in making aid allocations and assumes that governments have full control over policy outcomes to the neglect of external and structural issues.
This text may be freely used providing the source is credited.
Published: 27 November 2008 , last edited: 10 March 2009
Viewings since posted: 5668
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013 25 April 2013
Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience 24 April 2013
The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury 13 March 2013
The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012 26 October 2012