BIC: Bank and IDB projects fall short on accountability and participationUS NGO, Bank Information Centre, published a report examining how well the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) incorporate participation and accountability into project design. Of the projects reviewed, only a few had clear reference to a consultation process or a programme to ensure stakeholder participation. A third incorporated participation and accountability into their objectives, but fewer included transparent decision-making procedures or a robust evaluation system. Overall, a majority of the reviewed projects were deemed 'standard-mediocre'. Decentralisation, water and health projects were particularly poor. IDB projects did much worse than World Bank projects. This text may be freely used providing the source is credited. This page is: <http://brettonwoodsproject.org/art.shtml?x=564197> Published: 17 April 2009 , last edited: 17 April 2009 Viewings since posted: 2365 |
Articles: 3365 Επίκεντρο η Ελλάδα (Articles in Greek) Recent briefings & reports
Gender WDR: Limits, gaps, and fudges 8 February 2012
Breaking the mould: How Latin America is coping with volatile capital flows 15 December 2011
Time for a new consensus: Regulating financial flows for stability and development 15 December 2011
No fairy tale: Singrauli, India, still suffering years after World Bank coal investments 18 November 2011
Climate Investment Funds Monitor: October 2011 27 October 2011
Power surge: Lessons for the World Bank from Indian women's participation in energy projects 21 September 2011 Newswire |
home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact
RSS.91: highlights | newswire |
validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508
powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits