Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



IFC deceptions on Doing Business

News|Eurodad|22 September 2009|update 67|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

by Alex Wilks, Eurodad

Excitement caused by the International Finance Corporation´s (IFC) April announcement that it was changing how it scored countries in its controversial Doing Business publication (see Update 66) turned to dismay as the 2010 edition shows that very little has actually changed.

Singapore is again top of the rankings, while other countries such as Georgia are praised and given a better ranking for abolishing their social taxes. Belarus gets a good score for making it easier to fire people. Conversely, as the International Trade Union Confederation pointed out, Cambodia is said to be "making it more difficult to do business" because it introduced a social security contribution.

World Bank managing director and former Nigerian finance minister, Ngozi Ikonjo-Iweala, spoke out against jurisdictions with lax regulation and poor financial transparency, telling a conference in Washington DC that "we must hit financial centres very hard ... we need to hit Dubai and Jersey and Switzerland hard - this is the future of development". However, these jurisdictions are numbers 33, 5 (the UK) and 21 respectively in the Bank´s Doing Business ranking.

Research by NGO ActionAid International shows that the ´paying taxes´ indicator still rewards countries for cutting business taxes, irrespective of what the best level might be.

The World Bank has prided itself over the last decade in becoming seen as a ´knowledge bank´. Many newspapers and officials uncritically cite the Bank´s work without digging deeper. This is not the view of many researchers, such as Christian von Drachenfels of the German Development Institute. He and colleagues last year published Seven Theses on Doing Business, none of them complementary. They argue: "the reports basically advocate for minimum regulation. This perspective largely neglects the economic and social benefits of regulation".

At a time when every world leader is preaching the virtues of regulation, the IFC risks being seen as dangerously out of step.

Published: 22 September 2009 , last edited: 2 October 2009

Viewings since posted: 6484

Articles: 3466

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Επίκεντρο η Ελλάδα (Articles in Greek)
http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/el/
Με αφορμή την χωρίς προηγούμενο δραστηριότητα του ΔΝΤ στην Ελλάδα, το Bretton Woods Project παρέχει ορισμένα απο τα άρθρα του στα Ελληνικά.

Recent briefings & reports

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 5: April 2012   1 May 2012

'Leveraging' private sector finance: How does it work and what are the risks?  18 April 2012

IMF policy recommendations: Not enough change after the crisis  27 March 2012

Memorandum by the Bretton Woods Project for the UK Treasury Committee: Treasury Committee inquiry into global imbalances  27 February 2012

Gender WDR: Limits, gaps, and fudges  8 February 2012

Time for a new consensus: Regulating financial flows for stability and development  15 December 2011

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits