Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



World Bank work on land supports "a new form of colonialism"

News|Bretton Woods Project|17 June 2010|update 71|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

A set of voluntary principles for agricultural investment in developing countries, launched by the World Bank and other institutions in April, veils the promotion of investors' interests at the expense of host populations, warn civil society groups.

At a late April conference, the Bank and UN agencies released a discussion note, Principles for responsible agricultural investment that respects rights, livelihoods and resources. Based in part on the Bank's ongoing study of large-scale land acquisitions, the principles will feed into a consultation that could generate guidelines or codes of practice. The principles include: respecting existing rights to land and natural resources; strengthening food security; transparency and accountability; full consultation; and generating positive social and environmental impacts.

Though recognising that enforcement of existing frameworks is "limited", the principles document suggests that any guidelines or standards developed from these principles should be independently monitored, relying for implementation on investors' concern for their reputation, and an undefined role for governments and civil society.

NGO Friends of the Earth International warned that the principles would "legitimise and promote land grabbing", "a new form of colonialism". An international civil society coalition including social movement La Via Campesina and NGO GRAIN cautioned that the principles would not improve food security, and instead "aim to distract from the fact that today's global food crisis, marked by more than one billion people going hungry each day, will not be solved by large scale industrial agriculture, which virtually all of these land acquisitions aim to promote."

The coalition also warns that 'land grabbing' violates the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Bank advice spurs 'land grab'

A new report by US thinktank the Oakland Institute delves deeper into how the World Bank Group's technical assistance and advisory services to investors and developing country governments facilitate foreign acquisition of land (see Update 68, 62).

The report argues that the Bank's advice approaches foreign investment uncritically, prioritises returns for international investors over development concerns, and is "concerned with land markets only to the extent that they influence investment climates and ultimately, economic growth." For example, the Bank's Foreign Investment Advisory Service's 'investing across borders' (IAB) project measures the ease of establishing and operating a foreign-owned business, but "nothing about the IAB indicators seeks to consider the extent to which local populations in these countries will be affected."

Bank advice and services developed in response to investor complaints have promoted major legal changes in developing countries (see Update 52). In Southern Sudan, for example, vetting of potential investors has been removed and investment mobility increased; over a million hectares of land has been transferred to investors since 2008.

The report also collates evidence that land is often wrongly classified as unused and so available to investors, in contravention of customary land rights. This can lead to displacement and the loss of livelihoods. An indigenous Anuak from Gambella, Ethiopia, says that, "The foreign companies are arriving in large numbers, depriving people of land they have used for centuries." The report calls for the International Finance Corporation, the Bank's private sector arm, to be investigated and held accountable for its impacts.

Food security programme

At the Global Agriculture and Food Security Programme, a multi-donor trust fund managed by the Bank (see Update 70, 69), civil society groups welcomed stronger representation on the steering committee, and the decision not to use the Bank's controversial Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (see Update 43) as an indicator of a conducive policy environment in recipient countries. However, Neil Watkins of NGO ActionAid USA said concerns remained over the lack of reference to gender and the inadequacy of safeguards in the IFC's proposal for the programme's private sector window.

Published: 17 June 2010 , last edited: 17 June 2010

Viewings since posted: 249978

Articles: 3365

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Επίκεντρο η Ελλάδα (Articles in Greek)
http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/el/
Με αφορμή την χωρίς προηγούμενο δραστηριότητα του ΔΝΤ στην Ελλάδα, το Bretton Woods Project παρέχει ορισμένα απο τα άρθρα του στα Ελληνικά.

Recent briefings & reports

Gender WDR: Limits, gaps, and fudges  8 February 2012

Time for a new consensus: Regulating financial flows for stability and development  15 December 2011

Breaking the mould: How Latin America is coping with volatile capital flows  15 December 2011

No fairy tale: Singrauli, India, still suffering years after World Bank coal investments  18 November 2011

Climate Investment Funds Monitor: October 2011   27 October 2011

Power surge: Lessons for the World Bank from Indian women's participation in energy projects  21 September 2011

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits