|
The Pakistani government is facing increased pressure from the IMF to meet the requirements of its financial stabilisation programme, agreed in 2008, including the full implementation of a value added tax (VAT) and specific foreign borrowing targets (see Update 71). At the same time, fears over the cost of increased borrowing from IFIs remain evident, with finance minister Abdul Hafeez Shaikh stating that although Pakistan may need a follow up loan from the Fund, “in the long run we have to get rid of the IMF because it’s expensive.” His comments echoed those from the provincial government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which in May rejected a $100 million World Bank loan. A senior official from the provincial finance department said that, “this loan may enlarge fiscal space for the next budget, but the government and people will have to pay a price for it.” This text may be freely used providing the source is credited. This page is: <http://brettonwoodsproject.org/art.shtml?x=566440> Published: 18 June 2010 , last edited: 18 June 2010 Viewings since posted: 4169 |
Articles: 3795 Recent briefings & reports
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013 25 April 2013
Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience 24 April 2013
The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury 13 March 2013
World Bank on jobs: a "significant departure" or "business as usual"? 13 February 2013
The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012 26 October 2012 Newswire |
home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact
RSS.91: highlights | newswire |
validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508
powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits