Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



The role of the World Bank in carbon markets

Briefing|Amy Horton with Tom Fry|4 February 2011|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

This full report can be viewed as a pdf.


Executive Summary

This paper outlines the World Bank’s involvement in the carbon market and reviews concerns about its impacts on greenhouse gas emission reductions and development.  First, it introduces the role and aims of the Bank’s Carbon Finance Unit and the various funds and facilities that it manages.  The Bank has worked to shape the carbon market by reducing risk for other investors, setting social and environmental standards, and developing new types of projects.  It is now focusing on promoting national programmes', reducing emissions from deforestation; and large-scale, long-term carbon finance.

The paper then summarises the concerns that have emerged from official evaluations and scrutiny by civil society groups regarding the effectiveness of Bank carbon finance in reducing emissions and generating development benefits, adding new evidence where available. 

Concerns include:

  • Failure to produce expected emissions reductions;
  • Finance supporting heavily polluting industries, including coal power, and as a result delaying the transition to a low-carbon economy;
  • Lack of additionality in terms of finance and emission reductions;
  • Conflicts between the Bank’s carbon-intensive portfolio and its role in carbon finance;
  • Very limited finance going to smaller, poorer countries, despite these being an express priority for the Bank;
  • Evidence that purported development benefits are not integral to Bank carbon finance, despite the Bank being a development institution;
  • Negative social impacts associated with Bank carbon projects and programmes, including conflicts over resource rights and sharing of benefits;
  • Major shortcomings on transparency, engagement and accountability, particularly in monitoring whether commitments to community benefits are fulfilled;
  • Limited effectiveness in achieving the official Bank goal of transferring and diffusing technologies to developing countries and poor communities.

Published: 4 February 2011 , last edited: 6 April 2011

Viewings since posted: 11611

Articles: 3795

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Recent briefings & reports

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013  25 April 2013

Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience  24 April 2013

The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury  13 March 2013

World Bank on jobs: a "significant departure" or "business as usual"? 13 February 2013

The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012   26 October 2012

Latest video from IFIwatch.tv

The awakening of the squares 20 May

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits