Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



NGOs to new MIGA head: live up to your mandate

News|Bretton Woods Project|22 November 2004|update 43|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

According to a letter signed by over 40 NGOs delivered in September to Ms. Yukiko Omura, the new head of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA): "MIGA not only has weaker information disclosure, social and environmental policies than other arms of the World Bank Group, but it has also been criticized for failing to meet even its own minimum standards."

MIGA provides political risk insurance or guarantees to private investors and lenders to encourage foreign direct investment into developing countries.

NGO concerns include:

  • Portfolio balance: MIGA's portfolio does not differ significantly from private sector risk insurance portfolios. Despite its mandate as a development institution, MIGA has provided guarantees for projects with questionable pro-poor development benefits, disproportionately concentrated in middle-income countries that are already relatively well positioned to receive private investment.
  • Transparency: MIGA's information disclosure policies fall far short of the minimum standards of the Bank's other public and private-sector lending arms.
  • Social and environmental safeguards: In 2002, MIGA's independent evaluation office, the Operations Evaluations Unit (OEU), examined the institution's oil, mining and gas portfolio. Findings suggest that MIGA is failing to provide rigorous oversight of its projects to ensure that all investments are carried out in an environmentally and socially responsible manner.
  • Development effectiveness: The CAO found that MIGA does not have a system to monitor or collect information on the development impacts or effectiveness of the projects it guarantees.

Ms. Omura replied in mid-October affirming her "personal commitment to bring the agency closer to the rest of the World Bank Group". On portfolio balance, the MIGA head said she would "like to see MIGA doing more projects in our priority areas". On disclosure and safeguards, MIGA will complete a review of its policies "within 12 months of board approval of IFC's new safeguard policies" (IFC policies are scheduled to go to the board in mid-2005). On effectiveness, MIGA will conduct a "more rigorous and integrated analysis of the economic, environmental and social impacts of the projects" it supports. To help achieve this goal, it plans to hire a senior social specialist and a chief economist.

Published: 22 November 2004 , last edited: 8 February 2010

Viewings since posted: 4176

Articles: 3365

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Επίκεντρο η Ελλάδα (Articles in Greek)
http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/el/
Με αφορμή την χωρίς προηγούμενο δραστηριότητα του ΔΝΤ στην Ελλάδα, το Bretton Woods Project παρέχει ορισμένα απο τα άρθρα του στα Ελληνικά.

Recent briefings & reports

Gender WDR: Limits, gaps, and fudges  8 February 2012

Time for a new consensus: Regulating financial flows for stability and development  15 December 2011

Breaking the mould: How Latin America is coping with volatile capital flows  15 December 2011

No fairy tale: Singrauli, India, still suffering years after World Bank coal investments  18 November 2011

Climate Investment Funds Monitor: October 2011   27 October 2011

Power surge: Lessons for the World Bank from Indian women's participation in energy projects  21 September 2011

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits