No IFC audit despite new Peru oil spill
News||3 July 2012|update 81|
In May, the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman (CAO), the accountability mechanism of the International Finance Corporation (IFC, the Bank's private sector arm), closed the Maple Energy case (see Update 79) as it "does not merit an audit of IFC", despite a new oil spill by the company being reported in April. The CAO case was initiated after two indigenous communities from nearby the IFC-funded company's oil producing site in Peru filed a complaint in 2010 that oil spills from the Maple Energy operations had caused numerous social, environmental and health issues. According to the US-based NGO Accountability Counsel, "Maple Energy, under IFC's guidance, has not improved its social and environmental practices." It reported that "community members were not informed or alerted to the [April] spill", which represents "a continuing violation of the IFC's performance standards".
This text may be freely used providing the source is credited.
Published: 3 July 2012 , last edited: 3 July 2012
Viewings since posted: 2122
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013 25 April 2013
Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience 24 April 2013
The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury 13 March 2013
The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012
Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012 26 October 2012