Skip to main content
ENES

Search the Bretton Woods Project site

GEF: Gift Horse or Force for Change?

A critical study prepared for a meeting to discuss replenishing the Global Environment Facility, an international fund for environmental, criticises the World Bank’s use of the resources. When governments handed over GEF operations to the World Bank and UNDP, they hoped it would ‘mainstream’ (integrate) global environmental issues into all their operations.

The recent Study of GEF‘s Overall Performance, carried out by independent consultants, reaches disturbing conclusions. It found:

This and other recent studies have found that the environment is generally dealt with in a compartmentalised manner, and biodiversity is not yet viewed as a concern affecting multiple aspects of national development.

The RSPB, EDF and other NGOs tracking the Facility are demanding that the GEF Council, should:

communicate the Performance Study to the Bank and UNDP governing bodies and request them to report within 6 months on mainstreaming plans, with explicit commitments and timetables;

The Performance Study’s main weakness is its lack of analysis of how the GEF generates knowledge and absorbs lessons, one of the purposes for establishing it. The problems appear to be caused by poor internal mechanisms and the extensive use of short-term consultants to prepare projects.

The GEF Council’s Monitoring and Evaluation Unit needs the staff and financial resources to act independently of the Bank and UNDP and assess projects objectively and fearlessly.

Contact: Korinna Horta, EDF, 1875 Connecticut Ave., NW,Suite 1016, Washington DC 20009, USA, Tel: 001-202 387 3500, Fax: 001-202 234 6049, korinna@edf.org.