Menu

Bretton Woods Project

Critical voices on the world bank and IMF

Advanced search »
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Accountability
    • Conditionality
    • Environment
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • IFI governance
    • Infrastructure
    • Knowledge
    • Land
    • Private Sector
    • Rights
    • Social services
    • Trade
    • WB/IMF roles
  • Institutions
    • International Monetary Fund (IMF)
    • Other
    • Other International Financial Institutions
    • UK Government
    • UN
    • World Bank Group
  • Countries
    • East Asia & Pacific
    • Eastern Europe & Central Asia
    • International
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
    • South Asia
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
    • Western Europe
  • Publications
    • Observer
    • Dispatch
    • News Lens
    • Briefings
    • Analysis
    • Commentary
    • Background
    • Reports
    • Other
      • Bulletin
      • Update
      • CIFs Monitor
  • About Us
    • About the Bretton Woods Project
    • Staff profiles
    • Project Steering Group
    • Annual reports
    • Project news
    • Job opportunities
    • en
    • es
  • IFI governance
  • IFI governance

From issue 51 of The Bretton Woods Update

Related resources

Beyond the IMF

15 March 2006
G24

IMF appoints committee to study finances

18 May 2006
IMF

IMF investment account

14 April 2006
IMF

Related articles

Crisis financiera interna en el FMI

29 June 2006

IMF strategic review: too little, too late?

19 June 2006

Latin America sends IMF packing

23 January 2006

Putting the cart before the horse

20 February 2007

Serbia pagó, ¿le sigue Turquía?

19 April 2007

IFI governance

News

Internal financial crisis at the IMF

19 June 2006

versión español

The impetus for the IMF strategic review has come as much from pressure to reform the institution as from a crisis in its finances. This stems from early repayments by its biggest borrowers, Brazil and Argentina (see Update 49).

Now Indonesia, currently the second largest debtor to the Fund with nearly $8 billion outstanding, has promised to repay half of the country’s outstanding debts this year, with the balance to be settled in 2007. The Bank of Indonesia indicated it may even repay the second half of the debt before the end of 2006, at least 5 years earlier than the projected date for full repayment. This is despite a devastating earthquake hitting the country just 15 months after the tsunami that struck at the end of 2004.

will the Fund be good at implementing austerity programmes in-house?

Smaller countries are also joining the trend. In May The Statesman newspaper in Ghana reported that the government there would exit its IMF-supported poverty reduction and growth facility programme by October, repaying its loans because IMF fiscal constraints prevented the government from borrowing in private markets. Serbia announced its intention to repay its debts of $983 million to the IMF earlier than expected. It was reported on 16 May that the country had indicated its intention to the IMF, but that the exact details of repayment are still to be worked out, pending the resolution of the division of debts after Montenegro’s decision to split from Serbia.

This would leave the Fund with less than $20 billion in outstanding credits, its lowest in over 20 years. Just three years ago it had nearly $100 billion in outstanding loans. The bulk of the remaining credits is lent to Turkey, where there has also been discussion of early repayment. Academics Devesh Kapur and Richard Webb state in a paper for a March G24 meeting, “The de facto exit of its clientele, driven by the combination of high political costs associated with Fund borrowing and growing availability of alternatives, now poses an unprecedented challenge for the Fund, in particular on its income.”

Facing this growing budget gap, the managing director drafted a committee of international experts, including former US Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, to advise the organisation on its finances. The committee, comprised of central bankers and senior management from private sector investment banks, is tasked with advising the Fund on possible sustainable sources for financing its administrative and surveillance expenses. They are expected to report back in the first quarter of 2007.

In addition, the Fund established an investment account. Instead of funding all of its administrative expenditures out of fees and interest on lending, the IMF plans to earn income by investing a portion of its reserves in government securities. The irony is that the nearly $9 billion in reserves can only be invested in government securities denominated in the 4 reserve currencies – the dollar, the euro, the pound and the yen – meaning the Fund will be helping, in part, to underwrite the very current account imbalances in the US that it should be working to resolve. The Fund is also reportedly instituting a one-off adjustment to its salary scale as part of its efforts to rationalise its finances. One wonders whether the Fund will be as good at implementing austerity programmes in-house as it is in designing them for its borrowers.

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related resources

Beyond the IMF

15 March 2006
G24

IMF appoints committee to study finances

18 May 2006
IMF

IMF investment account

14 April 2006
IMF

Related articles

Crisis financiera interna en el FMI

29 June 2006

IMF strategic review: too little, too late?

19 June 2006

Latin America sends IMF packing

23 January 2006

Putting the cart before the horse

20 February 2007

Serbia pagó, ¿le sigue Turquía?

19 April 2007

Subscribe

Get our alerts and publications in your inbox

Share

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Advocacy Programs

  • Gender Equality & Macroeconomics project
  • Environmental advocacy

World Bank & IMF in the news

Finance

Analysis

1 June 2023

Financing the common good

The Jordan Times

Environment

News

1 June 2023

Albanese government urged to push international banks to stop funding fossil fuel development

The Guardian

Finance

Analysis

1 June 2023

The vicious cycle: Connections between the debt crisis and climate crisis

Action Aid USA

Accountability

News

25 May 2023

World Bank body delays vote on controversial loan to Brazilian dairy firm

Climate Home News
More news

Featured briefings

6 April 2023

World Bank and IMF Spring Meetings 2023

5 April 2023

The IMF at the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: The need for governance reform

As the world celebrates the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it is time the IMF’s shareholders use the opportunities provided by the anniversary and growing calls for reforms to the international financial architecture to redesign the IMF’s governance structures and programmes to ensure they are consistent with the commitments outlined in 1948 and with international human rights law.

5 April 2023

The global financial architecture and the international debt crisis: An urgent call for reform

Influence of unreformed international financial institutions and creditor interests in debt solutions in low- and middle-income countries plagued by delay and ineffective when undertaken.

More briefings

Donate

Donate to the Bretton Woods Project

Twitter

My Tweets
This website uses cookies. By using this website you agree to their use. More information

CONTENT

  • Open letters
  • Events
  • FAQ
  • Glossary
  • Resources

SUBSCRIBE

  • Subscribe by email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS feeds

HELP

  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility policy
  • Credits
  • Help
  • Contact us