Menu

Bretton Woods Project

Critical voices on the world bank and IMF

Advanced search »
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Accountability
    • Conditionality
    • Environment
    • Finance
    • Gender
    • IFI governance
    • Infrastructure
    • Knowledge
    • Land
    • Private Sector
    • Rights
    • Social services
    • Trade
    • WB/IMF roles
  • Institutions
    • International Monetary Fund (IMF)
    • Other
    • Other International Financial Institutions
    • UK Government
    • UN
    • World Bank Group
  • Countries
    • East Asia & Pacific
    • Eastern Europe & Central Asia
    • International
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • North America
    • South Asia
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
    • Western Europe
  • Publications
    • Observer
    • Dispatch
    • News Lens
    • Briefings
    • Analysis
    • Commentary
    • Background
    • Reports
    • Other
      • Bulletin
      • Update
      • CIFs Monitor
    • en
    • es
  • Finance
  • Finance

From issue 58 of The Bretton Woods Update

Related resources

World Economic Outlook October 2007

15 October 2007
IMF

Related articles

El Fondo lucha contra los controles del capital y no contra los turbulentos mercados del mismo

19 December 2007

Finance

News

Fund fights capital controls, not turbulent capital markets

4 December 2007

Despite concerns about the consequences of the credit market breakdown in rich countries spilling over into other countries, the IMF is nagging developing countries to open their capital accounts and planning to regulate sovereign wealth funds.

The October communiqué of the body of finance ministers that sets strategy for the IMF recognised the risks of the credit market breakdown. Given that the IMF’s first multilateral consultations failed to lead to concrete action to resolve global imbalances (see Update 54), there seems to be little appetite to make the IMF the locus of any new initiative on market volatility.

At the meetings the deputy governor of the People’s Bank of China, Wu Xiaoling, called for the Fund to do more surveillance over industrialised countries and spend less time telling developing countries what to do. “As the turbulence in the global financial markets caused by the US sub-prime mortgage market developments has adversely affected global growth prospects, it is all the more urgent a priority to strengthen surveillance of the systemically important advanced economies in order to safeguard global financial stability and economic prosperity.”

dismantling the floodgates at exactly the moment when a storm surge is arriving

Contentious capital controls

The situation in global markets has started pushing portfolio, equity and speculative capital towards developing countries, with India bearing the brunt of the influx. In the midst of the IMF and World Bank meetings in October, India was setting new records for the volume of capital inflows, even with some controls in place. Despite recognition of the dangers to financial stability of unfettered capital flows by nearly everyone, including the Fund’s former chief economist Kenneth Rogoff (see Update 39), the IMF seems intent on advising its members against using capital controls.

The IMF’s autumn editions of both the Global Financial Stability Report (GFSR) and World Economic Outlook (WEO) discussed how emerging-market countries can deal with capital inflows. The GFSR concluded that “capital controls should be used only as a last resort” and “may have uncertain effectiveness and unintended side effects.” The WEO advised central banks not to intervene and for governments to spend less money. Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the new IMF managing director, joined the debate shortly after taking office, warning India against imposing any capital controls: “It has been said or asked or it has been written that India should implement in one way or another some limits to the capital inflow. The problem of this kind of thing is it may undermine the confidence on the Indian economy. It will have an influence certainly on capital inflows but not always a good influence. I think the Indian authorities should think over several times before implementing this kind of an instrument”. The IMF is essentially arguing for dismantling the floodgates at exactly the moment when a storm surge is arriving.

This is the opposite conclusion of that reached across the road at the World Bank, which has warned against premature capital account liberalisation. In a seminar hosted by the South Asia department of the World Bank during the annual meetings in October, Thai finance minister Chalongphob Sussangkarn called for more support to countries that wanted to slow capital inflows. Former assistant director for research at the IMF Arvind Subramanian criticised market fundamentalists who opposed the use of controls. The Korean alternate executive director at the Bank, Choi Joong-Kyung, said that his own country’s capital account liberalisation occurred because policy-makers shifted from looking after national priorities to worrying solely about macroeconomic stability and that this invited the Asian financial crisis. The Bank’s chief economist for South Asia Shantayanan Devarajan summed up the session saying that it seemed clear that there was no justification for any rush to liberalisation and that capital controls can be useful in certain situations.

A timely IMF working paper on capital account liberalisation in India by Amadou Sy does clearly recognise the risks of introducing fuller capital account convertibility (FCAC), a euphemism for capital account liberalisation. Sy explains what prudential and regulatory measures must be put in place in order to safely further open up India’s economy to foreign money. However, the advice is unidirectional: the assumption is that liberalisation to foreign capital is always desirable.

Yilmaz Akyüz, former chief economist at UNCTAD, instead called for the IMF to be more proactive: “Guidelines for IMF surveillance should specify circumstances in which the Fund should actually recommend the imposition or strengthening of controls over inflows. It should also develop new techniques and mechanisms to separate capital account from current account transactions to distinguish among different types of capital flows from the point of view of their sustainability and economic impact, and to provide policy advice and technical assistance to countries at times when such measures are needed.”

Sovereign wealth fund regulation

The US and European proposals for more regulation of sovereign wealth funds, investment pools for countries’ foreign exchange reserves, have translated into Fund action despite the reservations expressed by the IMF’s chief economist (see Update 57). The communiqué of the Fund’s advisory body of finance ministers echoed the demands of the industrial countries, welcoming “the work by the IMF to analyse issues for investors and recipients of such flows, including a dialogue on identifying best practices.”

The Fund agreed to take up the task of drafting codes of conduct for the sovereign funds. IMF staff in the Middle East have claimed that the government investment institutions in that region have indicated that they are willing to abide by the new voluntary code. In mid-November the IMF hosted its first meeting of sovereign asset and reserve managers, which it plans to hold annually. Officials from 28 countries attended and Strauss-Kahn told the opening session that “a process is underway to define a role for the Fund on the issue of how sovereign wealth funds can be managed in ways that are consistent with global financial stability.”

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related resources

World Economic Outlook October 2007

15 October 2007
IMF

Related articles

El Fondo lucha contra los controles del capital y no contra los turbulentos mercados del mismo

19 December 2007

Subscribe

observer | newslens

Share

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

World Bank & IMF in the news

Infrastructure

News

4 August 2022

UN, IMF disagree on who should foot the bill of the energy crisis

Climate Home

Finance

Analysis

30 July 2022

The International Monetary Fund: Holy grail or poisoned chalice?

The Business Standard

Gender

Analysis

27 July 2022

CARE analysis : 150 million more women than men were hungry in 2021

CARE International

Environment

News

27 July 2022

The Barbados rebellion: An island nation’s fight for climate justice

New York Times Magazine
More news

Featured briefings

21 July 2022

Ending “absolute immunity” for the International Finance Corporation: The legacy of Jam v. IFC

EarthRights International examines how the Jam v. IFC case has helped to shift the landscape of accountability for international financial institutions by successfully challenging their claim to “absolute” immunity in US courts, potentially opening IFC up to further legal challenges in future.

21 July 2022

The Bretton Woods Observer: Summer 2022

14 April 2022

World Bank and IMF Spring Meetings 2022

More briefings

Donate

Donate to the Bretton Woods Project

About US

Established in 1995, the Bretton Woods Project (BWP) is a civil society watchdog of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. By monitoring the work of these institutions, supporting and connecting critical civil society communities, and advocating for transformational change, the Project challenges their power and fights for the development of policies that are gender transformative, equitable, environmentally sustainable and consistent with international human rights norms.

Twitter

My Tweets
This website uses cookies. By using this website you agree to their use. More information

ABOUT US

  • About the Bretton Woods Project
  • Staff profiles
  • Project Steering Group
  • GEM project
  • Environmental advocacy
  • Annual reports
  • Project news
  • Job opportunities

CONTENT

  • FAQ
  • Glossary
  • Resources
  • Open letters

SUBSCRIBE

  • Subscribe by email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS feeds

HELP

  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility policy
  • Credits
  • Help
  • Contact us