The findings of an Inspection Panel investigation into the Bank’s failure to comply with its own safeguard policies in its support for forest sector reforms in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) was discussed by the board in January (see Update 57). Twelve Congolese pygmy groups filed the complaint in 2005, regarding the exclusion of indigenous peoples from Bank-supported forest sector reforms and the absence of participatory land use planning processes. The Panel found that the Bank had violated its safeguard policies, including those on indigenous peoples and overestimated the timber revenues that the government could earn from timber exports, therby encouraging logging of the world’s second largest rainforest. Subsequent statements from management highlighted broad consensus on the need for the Bank to remain engaged in the country’s forest sector, but failed to mention specifics about what the Bank has learned from the failures documented by the Panel.
EarthRights International examines how the Jam v. IFC case has helped to shift the landscape of accountability for international financial institutions by successfully challenging their claim to “absolute” immunity in US courts, potentially opening IFC up to further legal challenges in future.
Donate to the Bretton Woods Project
Established in 1995, the Bretton Woods Project (BWP) is a civil society watchdog of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. By monitoring the work of these institutions, supporting and connecting critical civil society communities, and advocating for transformational change, the Project challenges their power and fights for the development of policies that are gender transformative, equitable, environmentally sustainable and consistent with international human rights norms.