Skip to main content
ENES

Search the Bretton Woods Project site

Post MDG Summit

Speakers: Stephen Pursey, Isolbel Ortiz, Matthew Martin, Cathy Pattillo
Chairs: Pamela Gomez, Oxfam

Presentations

Stephen Pursey, ILO

Isabel Ortiz, unicef

Matthew Martin, Development Finance International

Cathy Pattillo, IMF SPD

Discussion

PC – timing and pacing of rebuilding policy buffers

Cathy – lack of reserve usage influenced by SDRs, yes they didn’t decline, but a lot of reserves were used

Mark Harrison – why do you say MDGs for everyone everywhere – they were always only half of people

Isobel – key point of be aware of national averages, because some groups might be left behind

Stephen – Decent work is now part of MDG1

Elizabeth Stuart – looking at the downside risks; what about potential upside risks? Like more money for development from financial sector taxation?

Cathy – we are continuing to work on Gleneagles scenarios; we are doing more analysis of non-concessional borrowing by LICs; including growth impact of investment which we are revising in context of DSF; but no scenarios on financial taxes

Matthew – unions are weaker now than before; inequality is still not part of popular opinion

Student from Brazil – problem about poverty reduction in Brazil is about quantity not quality; if another crisis comes maybe EMEs would be hard hit; what about MDGs in these countries

Albert Gian – dialogue is very fragile, we need to strengthen our discourse, MDGs are too weak; lets get labour and environmental groups involved in the discourse

Francesca from ITUC – we have been very involved in the MDG process – working on decent work, inequality and social protection

Stephen – we need to direct public anger at crisis – it needs to address the issues and provide solidarity, not be directed at protectionism

Isabel – MDGs are minimalistic, but we may not even achieve the quantity goals; need to have growth and human development together – this is the UN Development Agenda