Social services

Background

Is the World Bank serious about engaging CSOs and communities

The experience of the HNP CSO consultative group

12 October 2013 | Minutes

IMF/WB Civil Society Forum

10 October 2013

Sponsor: Health Nutrition Population Civil Society Consultative Group

Panelists: Carolyn Reynolds (Communications adviser, WBG), Mette Kinoti (Head of programme management, African Medical and Research Foundation / AMREF),  Knud Voecking (Urgewald), Mohga Kamal-Yanni (Oxfam’s Senior health & HIV policy adviser)

The Bank’s HNP division established a Civil Society Consultative Group in 2011, made up of a group of NGO representatives. Face-to-face meetings alongside the Annual and Spring Meetings are supplemented by web or teleconference meetings in between. This session will look at the experiment and how the group is developing as well as more broad questions about the way that civil society is represented in the Bank’s thinking and activities.

Presentations

Carolyn Reynolds, WB

  • Why we set up the group from the WB’s perspective
  • Set up three years ago, a year to get the process underway, with Graham Miller then MD and CSOs
  • Wide gap in understanding of the WB work in health
  • New strategy on health just getting up to speed – strengthening health systems focus, working in new ways, including with civil society
  • Lots of critique towards WB on health work
  • Objectives of the group set collaboratively w civil society – facilitate informed discussions, CSOs views are shared with management, exchanging feedback on lessons learned, identify and facilities opportunities in countries where we work
  • Seven CSO representatives, and three by the Bank – so very much led by civil society
  • Wanted a home grown process, building on lessons learned, but not formulaic
  • Diverse deliberately, not too forced, to get best perspectives around the table
  • 2 ½ years later, second call for nominations
  • It has been an experiment, but a very positive one from our view, and a learning experience from all sides
  • Discussions have been frank, open discussions
  • Have been learning how to work better together, how to discuss global policy issues and connect with country level
  • It’s been clear it’s a time commitment – different groups have been able to give different time
  • Committed and resourced for this
  • Hope this group and the experience from the group could be shared across the Bank, and taken into other sectors – in line with the pillars of the new strategy

Mette Kinoti

  • Health organisation, working with CSOs and government, research institutions and donors like WB – including on policy level
  • Kenya specific case, but happens in many countries with organisations working on HIV/AIDS – allocation to CSOs, in particular smaller community organisations and NGOs
  • Financial support to CSOs, moving money measured by whether money was spent and accounted for, attempt to also measure if CSOs contribute to the implementation of the national strategy
  • You also need to ensure to build up capacity of civil society
  • A lot of resistance, WB said you CSOs are all about workshops etc – things are working well the way they are
  • There was a WB staff that started listening, maybe we should go to the field, so he went with government staff who were equally resistant
  • They could see that there were better results from the organisations that had been trained. After negotiation decision to stop just moving money, but include capacity building. Became a condition of WB funded organisations to be part of capacity building programme
  • Today, national AIDS control council has taken over the model
  • This is a success story, it took long, lots of frustration, but in the end it worked
  • Part of the reason was that we convinced a staff member of the WB.
  • This is good, it ended well, but very much dependent on an individual – how to change it to be more part of the system. From a country perspective, instead of having programme design by government and WB, civil society should be engaged from the beginning
  • Any programme about improving health, get the civil society engaged from the beginning when the programme is being designed
  • For the WB to have higher focus and integrate a community strengthening component, they partner with the government, if health is going to improve it must start at the community level
  • If implemented would have a more systematic approach

Mohga Kamal-Yanni

  • Working on global fund, GAVI to some extent
  • Organisational nature of the WB, its mandate is huge
  • Other organisations are multilateral, partnerships – not only the global fund is a creation of civil society
  • From the beginning with the set up of the Global Fund, it included NGOs, we were able to influence the governance structure from the beginning
  • GAVI slightly different, secretariat started it
  • Starting point is different, so governance is different, because of this the way of working is different
  • With GAVI has access to all the documents that come to the board, negotiation and discuss with the board and technical committees – direct access to documents and direct points
  • Sometimes win, sometimes loose, but at least officially you have a vote
  • Totally different from the WB – not sure how to have this model within the Bank
  • The impacts are seen with these organisations
  • Every round is launched after demands by NGOs, you can see your impact, and on some of the policies negotiated – some what we wanted, some a compromise, but at least cut the damage of other things
  • See the influence of the decisions
  • Learned from civil society side, the most important is informed relationship – what is the issue about, learning about the topics and what it means
  • You learn, you consult, you come to an agreed position
  • A big challenge for this organisation and the group making the connection between global policy and what happens in the country, how does it work in the country – this linkage still need a lot of work
  • Other point of learning, with Global Fund we have access to all the documents, we make comments, we were heavily involved on the strategy with lots of consultation
  • With WB we need to have the access to WB policies, the key important things, not at the end but at the start of it.
  • Together as civil society and informed consultative civil society can make a huge difference

Knud Voecking

  • Completely different perspective, German NGO mainly working on environmental and social standards – advocacy NGO, not implementing, so from a different perspective
  • Not a Northern patronising NGO, we only work when there is a request from a Southern partner
  • At WB meetings since 2002, have attended a lot of consultative processes, sometimes suffered through them – EIR, performance standards, review of IFC performance standards, palm oil strategy, WB energy strategy, safeguards review, just to name a few
  • A variety of approaches and qualities, although the WB has a policy on consultations, the different arms are separate
  • The energy strategy consultations was bad, a lot of NGOs were invited to a consultation in Germany – WB gave power point presentation, showing two off grid solar projects as the way forward, then asked for views. We wanted to discuss, but they just wanted to listen. Second phase was online. Not inclusive, in particular for those far away
  • On EIR, the process itself was good, a great document came out of it, but WB management refused to implement it, since it included a recommendation to phase out coal. Due to CSO pressure a consultative group was set up, but it faded away
  • Palm oil strategy, civil society gave hell to IFC due to investment in Indonesian palm oil due to atrocities linked to palm oil plantations – Zoellick put a halt to all palm oil investments. First time experienced WB staff really interacting in working groups, also government, private sector, NGO groups, and then mixed. These are the kind of consultation that achieve something, everyone listen to each other, a level playing field.
  • Mostly the merit of the WB, not the IFC – they just wanted to kick the box, but WB wanted a good outcome
  • In the South, to attend a consultation there are difficulties for small NGOs, completely impossible – how do they know its happening, for some a language problem, accessibility, very dubious way of selecting attendees, this even happens in Germany
  • If you go to Cambodia and Laos, etc, repressive governments – dangerous to speak out, which needs to be taken into account
  • Its about getting WB staff into the field, can be tricky – many WB staff have no clue what is going on in the field
  • Agree with Mette’s points – these are valid for all projects, and the approach WB should be taking. You go to the people and talk to the people, have a long consultative process, otherwise you will end up in a lot of trouble

 

Q&A

Q

Why does the WB and IMF don’t have the capacity  to engage with CSOs in a more extensive way. In Libya the newly elected leaders are not engaging in a way that they are truly representative to the citizens. Why not have the WB and IMF invest in the institutions to make them better, build capacity, and be more representative to citizens.

Q

Online consultations, eg twitter, social media, is that the direction we need to go to hear more voices  – most organisations have some online access, can we build on this

Reynolds

  • On the Libya question, this would need a deeper conversation, Can’t speak on Libya but WB is doing a lot of work on good governance and institutions of good governance, building from governance strategy of 5 years.
  • Embedded in our work. Work with public sector institutions on transparency, information policy, public finance systems, etc.

WB representative

  • Work on social accountability, supports civil society and governments to work together, Tunisia and Morocco – voluntary, Global Partnership for Social Accountability (GPSA). One component for countries in transition to support capacity building
  • Also work in the regions, talking about Morocco and health, the Bank is exploring a national health charter with a consultative process, and how to improve transparency and accountability
  • Support national governance with civil society

Q

What mechanisms are you proposing in Morocco, as Libya is in a similar situation, how do you practice it on the ground, mechanism, etc

Marcos, WB

  • Colleagues working with governments, discussing principles including a code of conduct on consultations, before discussing mechanisms. Also national dialogue, to make inclusive
  • GPSA set up last year, first round of grantees, 12 organisations have been approved for funding. USD 0.5 – 1 million for social accountability issues
  • Second round to be launched in November, 32 countries now
  • Important not just the funding side, partners, a diverse range of organisations including Oxfam GB, CARE, also foundations e.g. Ford Foundation
  • Civil society is a key partner, not just funding, but providing knowledge

Kamal-Yanni

  • Always balance between what the WB can do and sovereignty, always a sensitive way of handling it. In Egypt two constitutions, now very wide consultation. WB can help sharing the experience.

Voecking

  • In defence of the management, you have big players on the board, WB staff do a lot to try to work around this, there are some committed people here
  • Not completely opposed to online consultation, but its not the way to consult – in favour of dialogue, especially face to face in informed dialogue, so you understand each other, this is not the case through twitter, etc  – you need all of it
  • A case where a dam was supposed to be built, people had one mobile phone and needed to climb a hill to receive signal

Q

What is the WB doing to consult better in repressive countries, eg Turkmenistan. Reprisals are seen in countries where people speak out against WB projects. How to improve the feedback loop of consultations, organisations participation in country partnership strategies, but don’t feel they are influencing.

John Garrison, civil society liaison, WB

  • Agree consultation is a work in progress, difficult with an institutions working in so many countries, and also differences internally, eg IFC
  • New report on consultation this week – one portal now for consultations – a lot of the results from the consolations will also be there.
  • The only thematic consultative group we have is on health, good methodology and structure, but have a different approach to the UN etc.

Nicole, WB

  • We started in the fall 2009, since we had so many partners in health, after writing the strategy. Countries and civil society called for their involvement. The dialogue was the most important, to clarify issues, etc.
  • Sometimes on an issue its easier to engage, e.g. on how to deliver health care. In some repressive countries we had the best engagement with civil society, but always on an issue, a good entry point to the discussion.

Reynolds

  • We do have to engage in governments, look different in different countries and evolve over time – we do care about human rights, citizens voice and connections to make sure views are reflected.
  • The principle is there, repressive countries are difficult, the WB can’t change a repressive government, society will. Can we help with this – this is a work in progress, what role to play

Marcos, WB

  • Open government partnership, will discuss with governments, we are concerned about this issue – we have to prioritise as well.

Kinoti

  • Global health partnership, meet every second year, encourage to come with civil society representation that represents network. Became bad practice not to have civil society there.
  • On country partnership strategies, you are invited, spend time – we should not just accept that consultation is about being in one meeting. Should help formulate how the process should be. Otherwise just for the government to be ignored.

Kamal-Yanni

  • Key thing for us to be informed, we get invited but don’t know the issue that well, so can’t force the government to change – identify clear issues, and lobby for them.

Simon Wright, Save the Children

  • For change to happen, people inside need to have dialogue and people outside put pressure. People inside need to ensure not to be too co-opted, we have started setting the agenda more, also need to communicate with the outsiders – ensure people know what we are doing.
  • Please communicate us and we’ll try to build a platform form broader communication.

 

 

 

 

 

More background on this issue

IFI governance

Background

6 October 2021 | Minutes

Building back better health systems: lessons from the WBG's Covid-19 response and recovery plans

Notes from the Civil Society Policy Forum session on 6 October on the World Bank's need to highlight the centrality of public healthcare systems, central to a just and equitable recovery.

Social services

Background

26 March 2021 | Minutes

The role of the World Bank in ensuring universal and equitable COVID-19 vaccines for all

Notes from the virtual Civil Society Policy Forum event on March 26.

Social services

Background

24 March 2021 | Minutes

Universal access to healthcare: Lessons learned from Public-Private Partnerships

Notes from the Civil Society Policy Forum session on 24 March.

Conditionality

Background

2 October 2020 | Minutes

Fiscal space for universal health and social protection post Covid-19 pandemic: How to prevent austerity

Notes from the Civil Society Policy Forum Session on 2 October.

Social services

Background

5 October 2020 | Minutes

World Bank Group’s ‘Maximizing Finance for Development’ in times of Covid-19

Notes from the virtual Civil Society Policy Forum at the 2020 World Bank and IMF Annual Meetings 5 October session on the World Bank's 'Maximizing Finance for Development' and the Covid-19 response.

Social services

Background

1 November 2019 | Minutes

Leveraging Private Sector Engagement in Health: Maximizing or Obstructing Progress towards Universal Health Coverage?

Notes from CSPF on 18 October on the growing trend of directing public finance to support business in healthcare.

IFI governance

Background

17 April 2015 | Minutes

Ebola debt relief – Implications and next steps

Notes from a meeting on Ebola during the World Bank spring meetings.

IFI governance

Background

16 March 2015 | Minutes

UK civil society meeting with UK World Bank Executive Director Gwen Hines

Notes of a meeting with UK World Bank Executive Director Gwen Hines 25 February 2015.

IFI governance

Background

10 October 2014 | Minutes

UK civil society meeting with UK World Bank Executive Director Gwen Hines

Notes of a meeting with World Bank executive director Gwen Hines in October 2014.

Social services

Background

9 April 2014

Ensuring the Bank’s investment in and prioritisation of reproductive health up to 2015 and beyond

Social services

Background

12 October 2013 | Minutes

Is the World Bank serious about engaging CSOs and communities

Minutes from a civil society event on civil society consultations in the health sector at the WB/IMF annual meetings.

Accountability

Background

29 April 2013 | Minutes

UK civil society meeting with UK World Bank Executive Director Gwen Hines

Notes of a meeting with UK executive director to the World Bank Gwen Hines in April 2013

Infrastructure

Background

23 April 2013 | Minutes

Colombia case study: results measurement and poverty eradication

This session examined Colombia's private sector partnerships and poverty eradication programme.

IFI governance

Background

23 April 2013 | Minutes

The private sector and poverty eradication

This session gave an overview on the links between private sector and healthcare provision in tackling poverty.

IFI governance

Background

22 April 2013 | Minutes

From the Arab revolutions to global austerity trends

This session examined issues thrown up by the Arab revolutions, including the fiscal, monetary, tax and investment policies being considered by governments facilitating, or hindering countries in the Arab and other regions in building an inclusive economy and supporting socioeconomic recovery, the impact on public expenditure for the strengthening of education, health, and other social sectors as well as the management of chronic and high unemployment and high food and fuel prices.

Rights

Background

7 January 2013 | Minutes

UK civil society meeting with UK World Bank Executive Director Gwen Hines

Notes of a meeting with UK executive director to the World Bank Gwen Hines in December 2012

Conditionality

Background

23 April 2012 | Minutes

A Global Shared Societies Agenda

Minutes meeting for A Global Shared Societies Agenda

Accountability

Background

15 September 2011 | Minutes

Notes of meeting between UK Executive Director to World Bank and Civil Society Groups

Civil society organisations met UK Executive Director to the World Bank and staff from the Department for International Development to discuss water, the Bank's private sector approach, health and nutrition, safeguards review and energy strategy.

Accountability

Background

14 April 2011 | Minutes

Notes of meeting between UK Executive Director to World Bank and Civil Society Groups

Civil society organisations met UK Executive Director to the World Bank and staff from the Department for International Development to discuss the World Development Report on conflict, security and development; the spring meetings and food security; the World Bank's energy strategy and performance in the health sector.

Accountability

Background

4 October 2010 | Minutes

Meeting on the World Bank between DFID and UK NGOs

Notes of a meeting between UK civil society and DFID staff.

Infrastructure

Background

28 April 2010 | Minutes

Meeting on the World Bank with DFID

Notes of a meeting between Rachel Turner of DFID and UK NGOs, April 2010

Accountability

Background

6 April 2010 | Minutes

Meeting between UK civil society and Susanna Moorehead, UK Executive Director to the World Bank

Minutes of a meeting between UK civil society, UK World Bank Executive Director Susanna Moorehead, and DFID staff

Accountability

Background

22 September 2009 | Inside the institutions

Safeguard policies and performance standards

Originally drafted as internal operational policies to guide staff, World Bank safeguard policies evolved after pressure from environmental and social groups in the 1980s and were first officially implemented in 1998. They aim to protect people and the environment from the adverse effects of Bank-financed operations and are based on international agreements, even if these protections are not explicitly provided for in the borrower country's national law.

Environment

Background

9 October 2008 | Minutes

Highlights: Meeting of UK NGOs with UK Alternate Executive Director to the World Bank

Meeting between UK NGOs and UK Alternate Execituve Director to the World Bank Caroline Sergeant on 5 September 2008.

Social services

Background

1 April 2008 | Inside the institutions

The World Bank and health

In the last five years the global system for channelling development finance to the health sector has changed radically, causing the Bank to seriously re-examine its role in health finance. This article covers the who, what, where and how much of the World Bank's work with in the health sector.

Accountability

Background

22 February 2008 | Minutes

BWI-UK / UKAN workshop on World Bank strategic review

Highlights of a 13 February 2008 UK NGO workshop discussing elements of the World Bank's long-term strategic review.

Environment

Background

18 February 2008 | Minutes

Highlights of BWI-UK network meeting with Caroline Sergeant, 7 February 2008

Highlights of NGO meeting with alternative executive director to the World Bank, Caroline Sergeant

Environment

Background

23 October 2007 | Minutes

The agenda of the Development Committee and the provision of Global Public Goods

Highlights of a 20 October meeting hosted by the FES Foundation on global public goods, at the World Bank-IMF annual meetings 2007.

Finance

Background

16 April 2007 | Minutes

Civil society meeting with German Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development and Liberian Min

Minutes from meeting: The agenda of the Development Committee and Africa as a focal point for growth and responsibility, with Heidemarie Wieczorek-Zeul, Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany and Antoinette M. Sayeh, Minister of Finance, Republic of Liberia.

Social services

Background

23 November 2006 | Inside the institutions

The World Bank and disability

The Bank’s formal commitment to disability work began in June 2002 with the founding of the disability and development team within the social protection unit of the human development vice-presidency. The team’s primary focus is on cooperating at the international level on including the disabled in development.

Social services

Background

11 September 2006 | Inside the institutions

The World Bank and youth

World Bank and its work on youth

Social services

Background

19 June 2006 | Inside the institutions

The World Bank and ageing

The who, what, where and how much of the World Bank's work with the aged and pension reform.

Social services

Background

28 April 2006 | Minutes

Evaluating the impact of the PRGF: The cases of Ethiopia, Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia

Highlights of a civil society dialogue on the IMF Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, at the World Bank spring meetings in Washington, 20 April 2006.

Social services

Background

23 January 2006 | Inside the institutions

The World Bank and education

brief summary of the World Bank's work and priorities in education

Conditionality

Background

27 September 2005 | Resource

Social development in the World Bank, from vision to action

Brief summary of the presentation of the World Bank's social development report, and follow-up discussion

Environment

Background

28 June 2005 | Minutes

Highlights of meeting between Tom Scholar and UK NGOS

Highlights of meeting between Tom Scholar and UK NGOS

Environment

Background

28 April 2005 | Minutes

UK NGO meeting with executive director Tom Scholar: uncorrected highlights 4 April 2005

Minutes of Spring meeting with Tom Scholar and UK NGOs in London

Infrastructure

Background

22 April 2005 | Minutes

IFC consultation with civil society on the safeguard review

Highlights of the IFC consultation with civil society on its revision of the WBG environmental and social safeguards

Environment

Background

26 January 2005 | Inside the institutions

IMF and World Bank emergency response

The role of the IMF and World Bank in responding to emergencies and coordinating with relief efforts.

Accountability

Background

1 December 2004 | Minutes

Draft Notes of WB-CSO dialogue on urban water and sanitation services, 18-19 Nov 2004

DRAFT action points and notes identified by participants to the WB-CSO dialogue held at WaterAid in London on 18-19 November.

Environment

Background

8 October 2004 | Minutes

Meeting with UK Executive Director to the WB and IMF, Tom Scholar

Meeting with UK Executive Director to the WB and IMF, Tom Scholar, Annual Meetings 2004, 14 September

Latest articles on this issue

Apollo Hospital, Dhaka, 2014

Accountability

News

Another day, another IFC scandal

A Telegraph exposé unveils how a private hospital group in India which received £120 million in IFC investment since 2005 was running an illegal organ trading scheme, adding to a growing number of IFC-funded scandals.

9 April 2024

Social services

News

World Bank’s commitment to private sector-led development casts doubt on effectiveness of new Pandemic Preparedness Fund

The World Bank’s proposal to establish a fund for Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response raises questions about the Bank’s support for private sector healthcare at the expense of public provision.

21 July 2022

Conditionality

News

The human face of the World Bank's private sector bias: The privatisation of Kenya's healthcare

A November 2021 report by the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice at New York University highlights the human rights consequences of the World Bank’s Maximising Finance for Development approach.

21 July 2022

IFI governance

Background

Building back better health systems: lessons from the WBG's Covid-19 response and recovery plans

Notes from the Civil Society Policy Forum session on 6 October on the World Bank's need to highlight the centrality of public healthcare systems, central to a just and equitable recovery.

6 October 2021 | Minutes

Social services

Analysis

IMF rhetoric and practice on public sector wage constraints: Advice to slash spending continues despite Covid-19 pandemic

Forthcoming research from ActionAid International shows IMF’s dogmatic support for public sector wage bill cuts continues.

29 September 2021 | Guest analysis

Social services

News

Malpass makes World Bank a pariah with opposition to TRIPS waiver

World Bank President comes out against temporarily waiving intellectual property rights on Covid-19 vaccines

13 July 2021

Social services

Background

The role of the World Bank in ensuring universal and equitable COVID-19 vaccines for all

Notes from the virtual Civil Society Policy Forum event on March 26.

26 March 2021 | Minutes

Social services

Background

Universal access to healthcare: Lessons learned from Public-Private Partnerships

Notes from the Civil Society Policy Forum session on 24 March.

24 March 2021 | Minutes

Social services

Analysis

World Bank support for Covid-19 vaccination fails to ensure equitable access

World Bank’s Covid-19 vaccination programme contributes to global response but fails to ensure free access to vaccines and healthcare during the pandemic.

23 March 2021

Social services

Analysis

World Bank funded $17.3 million Uganda reproductive health voucher PPP fails to reach the poorest women

World Bank backs private sector voucher project in Uganda as poorest women lose out.

6 October 2020